Let’s face it: most folks either love or hate standardized tests. If you perform well
on them, you tend to love them; if you perform less well on them, you tend to hate
them. Those who are fond of the GMAT are prone to accept score results as prima facie evidence of their ability to
perform well in an MBA program, either reinforcing a track record of strong performance
or making up for a not-so-illustrious academic record. (It is these kinds of
applicants you sometimes see on the Business Week’s
b-school forums, where they use their laser-like focus to compare and fret over
10 point differences in GMAT scores.
Individuals
who dislike the GMAT test often view it as an arbitrary and inaccurate measure
of their ability to perform in grad school. A common refrain is: ‘I just don’t test well
on standardized tests – my brain does not function that way;” or “Performance
on standardized tests measures one’s ability to perform well on tests and not
much more.”
As
with many things in life, reality lies somewhere in between the two extremes of
love and hate. The GMAT test, when considered along with one’s prior academic
experience at the baccalaureate level and beyond, is an accurate predictor (at
UCLA Anderson, at least) of how one performs in his or her first year in the
MBA program. Fortunately for most
applicants, there is no exact cutoff or minimum at UCLA Anderson of either of
these measures. The distribution of GMATs and GPAs that reflect an ability to
perform well, as reflected in each year’s incoming class, is fairly broad.
Beyond
these numeric measures of preparedness for an MBA lie such qualitative measures
as leadership and teamwork skills, managerial experience, initiative, ability
to learn and growth from mistakes, introspection, ability to articulate clear
reasons for an MBA and career goals going forward, contributions (to school,
work, and/or community), etc. It is here that the bulk
of time of applicant evaluation is spent. Although less quantifiable dimensions,
they are equally important.
So whether or not you love or hate the GMAT, you may want to temper your view. At
the same time that the GMAT is not the quintessential measure of an applicant’s
merits, it is a useful evaluative tool in the admissions process. A healthy
dose of ambivalence just might be in order…..
Recent Comments